![]() ![]() The Blood Ravens are established to have enough similarities in battle doctrine (i.e. Here what the Lexicanum says on the hints the Blood Ravens might be successors of the 1k sons: He also mentions that he may change plot of fans guess it too early, and that they try to not confirm fan theories. Considering that is the exact opposite of the standing policy of"everything is canon" make of it what you will. Graham's Codex has not been canon for 10+ years.". laugh.gif" (with laughing-smilie at end) Later he says "And 4th edition was a LONG time ago. Also, since it took me a shilte to find it, here the original source It's an post exchange in a forum, and the exact answer is "It's not the Thousand Sons. The two are in NO WAY connected, and people need to stop reading so much into video games from ten years ago."īecause wasn't it obvious they were blood angels from the beginning!? sarcasm I also know exactly what the deal is with Revuel Arvida. ![]() Laurie Goulding: "I know exactly what the deal is with the Blood Ravens. Laurie Goulding: It's not the Thousand Sons.įreelancer: "So does that mean Laurie your prevy to the origins of the blood ravens?" If that's the thousand sons it would be safe to assume the battle would of been post Prospero. I don't think we know much about the heresy battle bar the blood ravens parent chapter were involoved. A quote from an interview:įreelancer: "The reason I'm going you throw that into the mix is because of blood ravens in 40k. This has been met with disdain and frustration. On 16th september 2016 Laurie Goulding confirmed they're not Thousand Sons writing on The First Expedition. So I was reading through 1d4chan's Bloody Magpies page, and found this : ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |